Who are the 144,000?—Revelation 7:1-8

Did you know that you’re in the Bible? Sometimes we might wish that there were Bible stories about us, but in fact there are stories that talk about God’s people from all nations. Revelation 7:9-17 is one of these passages.

The scene before it, however, talks about the 144,000, twelve thousand from each tribe (Rev 7:1-8). Who are they?

If we take the number literally, we should also take the other details literally: Jewish male virgins (using Rev 14:1-5 also). For this reason, the interpretation offered by Jehovah’s Witnesses is inconsistent and cannot be correct.

Some scholars take the details as literally as possible. They argue that John envisions a literal 144,000 Jewish men from twelve tribes in the end-time. After all, many Jewish people expected the restoration of the lost tribes, and there is biblical reason to expect a special movement among the Jewish people near the end (Rom 11:25-27). This is a respectable scholarly interpretation, although most of the twelve tribes are no longer known.

Other scholars, by contrast, believe that Revelation intends the details here as figurative, communicating a different inspired point. They offer several reasons:
1. This is the number of God’s “servants” (Rev 7:3). Elsewhere in Revelation this title often includes all Jesus’s followers (1:1; 2:20; 22:3, 6).
2. They are those who follow Jesus and have been redeemed (14:3).
3. Revelation often uses symbols. After all, no one takes literally the woman clothed with the sun (12:1). Further, Revelation sometimes explains details as symbolic (1:20). A symbolic reading is actually more consistent with Revelation as a whole.
4. The numbers connect with a later passage in Revelation. The New Jerusalem is said to be 12,000 stadia (about 1400 miles, or 2200 kilometers!) wide, long, and high, with a wall of 144 cubits (about 200 feet or 65 meters). Through this narrative connection, Revelation portrays them as the people of God for the city of God—they are new Jerusalemites.
5. That’s why 14:1 portrays them “standing on Mount Zion” with Jesus. Zion was the temple or, more generally, Jerusalem.
6. Why might they be described in terms of the twelve tribes? This listing of the tribes is unusual, and even leaves out the tribe of Dan. But elsewhere in Revelation all believers are described as spiritually Jewish (cf. Rev 2:9; 3:9)—what Paul would call grafted into the heritage of God’s people. The churches appear as lampstands (1:20)—the standard symbol in the ancient Mediterranean world for Jewish communities.
7. The next vision speaks of a numberless multitude from all nations. We could read this as a contrast instead of as a parallel, but we should note the description of this multitude …
8. They serve him day and night in his temple (7:15)—just like priests in ancient Israel (Ps 134:1). That they will never hunger, thirst, or suffer heat (Rev 7:16), and that the Lord will lead them to springs of water, echoes promises to Israel in the time of restoration (Isa 49:10). That God will wipe away all tears from their eyes (Rev 7:17) likewise echoes a promise probably especially to God’s people (Isa 25:8). In other words, they are portrayed as God’s people just as the 144,000 are. The passages thus appear to be parallel, with the second further explaining the first.

For these reasons, I believe that the case for reading them as representative of all God’s people is stronger than the case for reading them as a literal 144,000. Thus, the 144,000 may stand for all those who will someday be in the New Jerusalem—all New Jerusalemites, all of God’s people.

Another possible view is compatible with this one, although I am less certain about it. Many scholars see the people in the second passage as martyrs. Some see the 144,000 in the first passage as God’s end-time army, because they are portrayed as consecrated men numbered like a military census in the Old Testament. These views are debated, but if they are correct, then God’s church is portrayed as an “army” of nonviolent martyrs.

If this is correct, a parallel would then emerge. In Revelation 5:5-6, John heard about the lion from the tribe of Judah—the conquering, warlike Messiah. When he turned, however, what he saw was instead a slaughtered lamb. That is, Jesus conquered not in the expected way, but through laying down his life. Here in chapter 7 Revelation might portray the end-time army that some expected as instead a movement of martyrs—of people who laid down their lives to announce Jesus and his purposes in the world. What price are we willing to pay to follow Jesus’s truth and depend on him?

The “army of martyrs” interpretation may be correct. I am less certain about it than about these being God’s people, because some of the supporting evidence is less than certain. I do believe that the evidence is strong, however, that this multitude represents God’s people.

Who are the 144,000? You are, if you trust Jesus as your Lord and Savior. Together we have a mission to honor Jesus, no matter what the cost.

Craig Keener is author of The NIV Application Commentary on Revelation (Zondervan, 2000).

The riddle about understanding–Matthew 13:3-23

Like many sages in his day, Jesus told parables. Parables were a way to illustrate the principles about which a sage was teaching. Sometimes, however, sages chose to speak in riddles, especially to outsiders; only the most determined students then would figure out the meaning. Wisdom was like a treasure, and it was suitable only for those who were fully devoted to its pursuit.

Teachers often explained their parables. Because parables illustrated points, it made little sense to tell these stories in isolation, without connecting them to the points one was illustrating. The exception would be if those very stories functioned as riddles. Riddles challenged hearers to care enough about their meaning to persevere in exploring them.

One day Jesus told a parable that was meant to illustrate this very point. Most of his audience consisted of Galilean farmers, so they could understand his story on the surface level. What they might not understand was what Jesus meant to illustrate by it. Although ancient Mediterranean farmers sometimes plowed before sowing, sometimes they sowed before plowing; ancient sources document both approaches. Still, to make his point Jesus may stretch the story a bit. In this case, some of the seed got wasted because this farmer knew only the surface of his soil (which would seem unlikely if the farmer had ever worked this land before!)

Some seed was scattered in the open, but birds ate it (Matt 13:4). Then as now, birds were ready to devour farmers’ seed and crops. A second group of seeds sprang up quickly on rocky soil, but because the roots were not deep the grain withered under the hot sun (13:5-6). A third group of seeds was choked by thorns (13:7). If thistles had been cut down rather than uprooted, the farmer might not see their roots in the soil; but by April, they could grow to a meter or higher. Nevertheless, the fourth group of seeds, which did bear fruit, yielded many times more grain than all the seed that had been sown (13:8). A hundredfold harvest was magnificent (Gen 26:12), but even thirtyfold and sixtyfold were excellent. Apart from the fertile Jordan Valley, the average yield for grain in in Judea and Galilee was about tenfold. To reap even thirtyfold was to reap far more grain than one had invested in sowing.

Jesus drew on an ancient farming principle: you do not know which seed or which day’s labor will succeed, so you labor widely (Ecclesiastes 11:3-6). We do not know where our sowing will bear fruit, but we can be confident that the overall harvests will make up for every effort. Some people for whom we labor will not respond, but the word will multiply through others many times over. In the end, it will all be worthwhile.

Jesus’s own disciples did not understand why he spoke to the crowds in parables. Jesus therefore explained that he used parables as riddles to keep the meaning obscure to those who deserved judgment (Matt 13:13-15). The disciples, by contrast, would be blessed with understanding (13:17). It is important, however, to note how they received this understanding: Jesus explained the message to his closest followers (13:18). In other words, understanding was available for those who determined to be close followers, to be disciples. Disciples were not limited to the twelve; Jesus invites whoever wishes to be his disciple to follow him—so long as they are ready to follow to the cross (16:24).

All of this, in fact, is what the parable of the sower is about, as the Lord goes on to explain. Some heard the message about the kingdom but did not understand it, so the devil’s agents stole the message from their heart (13:19). Others were happy to receive the message, but when it brought them hardship, they abandoned it (13:20-21). Still others listened to the message, but other competing interests took priority and the hearers did not become true followers of the message (13:22).

What makes the entire enterprise worthwhile, however, is that some bear fruit many times more than what is sown in them. These are the ones, Jesus says, who “hear the message and understand it” (13:23). Who are those who understand? Not the crowds, who watch Jesus heal the sick, listen to his stories, and then go home. Those who understand are the disciples—Jesus’s followers, who stay to hear his interpretations. They are the ones who persevere when things do not seem to make sense, until they hear the Lord’s explanation. These are the ones who do not simply nod with approval that Jesus is a great teacher, but those who embrace him as their Lord and Savior.

In the context of Jesus’s ministry, the meaning of the parable should have been fairly obvious anyway. Not only did the Pharisees denounce him (12:24), but his own family did not yet recognize the truth of his ministry (12:46-50) and his home town rejected him (13:53-58). Nevertheless, large crowds gathered around Jesus (13:2). The kingdom did not belong to Jesus’s opponents or even (in their current state) to the expectant crowds; it belonged to Jesus’s disciples.

Although the meaning should have been obvious to the disciples, they often needed an explanation (13:36)—and Jesus provided one. That is good news: for those who are truly willing to persevere in following Jesus, Jesus provides the understanding. We are saved completely by his grace; we merely need to value the message and welcome the transformation that it brings.

Historical Reliability of the Bible

Craig wrote an article on the historical reliability of the Bible for the Exploring God website, focusing on the periods of Abraham and the patriarchs, 2 Kings, and the Gospels. (The available historical evidence to examine these passages in the Bible increases from one discussion to the next.)
The article is available at:
http://www.exploregod.com/is-the-bible-reliable-paper

Ignoring injustice–Proverbs 24:12

Genocides have often happened while the world turned its eyes away. It was not that no one knew what was going on. It was that some did not want to know. The twentieth century saw genocides against Armenians, Jews, Roma people, in Cambodia, Rwanda, Congo-DRC, and the Sudan, among others–what are we ignoring now?
See the full article at: http://www.evangelicalsforsocialaction.org/we-cannot-say-we-did-not-know/

R. T. Kendall’s Holy Fire

Craig virtually never publishes online book reviews, but since he made an exception for MacArthur’s Strange Fire, he agreed to provide one last exception for R. T. Kendall’s Holy Fire as well. Kendall’s book gets right what MacArthur’s book gets right without getting wrong what MacArthur’s book gets wrong.

The review appears at:
http://pneumareview.com/rtkendall-holy-fire-ckeener/